I Was On Clinical Trial For Last 4 Mts. Few Days Back It Has Failed. Now My Doctor Suggested For Autologus Transplant.
Is Autologus transplant beneficial when Free kappa above 1000.
Hi Viswanadhank, I didn't have a good response to induction treatments. I had an autologous transplant in 2017. It was a rough procedure. It took about 3 months to get my strength back. I have done pretty well since. Wishing you the best outcomes.
I had 2 Autologous SCTs and they gave me 12 years of fairly decent quality of life and I would do it again if I could but I am too old to be able to get one. It’s not an easy thing but it’s the heavy duty chemo that they give you before your transplant that kills your whole immune system and you have to be really careful about infection and it takes a very very long time to recover completely. It took me about at least 9 months to recover completely.
Autologous stem cell transplants can be beneficial for multiple myeloma patients, even if certain markers like free kappa light chains are elevated. Here are some key points:
- Effectiveness: Autologous stem cell transplants have been shown to extend survival in multiple myeloma patients. In a study involving over 13,000 Show Full Answer
Finally, now in Dec 2023, Dana-Farber made a new Press Release stating that if a person has a Very Good to Complete Response - Do Not Get an ASCT (Transplant) because they've looked back at the damage the ASCT caused which is More Frequent Infections of a More Serious Nature.
In 2010, Dana-Farber started the Determination Clinical Trial. As they moved from Stage 1 to 2 to 3, based on their Results of Achieving a Longer Time before the First Remission, they convinced the FDA and Industry that everyone with MM must get a ASCT after Induction. During my Treatment in 2021, It was strenuously pushed-on-me but I said - No
Here's there Press Release - there's plenty of tech jargon to try to soften their message but they've finally admitted the procedure has too many downside (serious long term side effects). In their original Sales Pitch (2018 and earlier) they presented their Conclusions based solely on the very Worst Case Responses from the Clinical Trial.
https://www.dana-farber.org/newsroom/news-relea...
Even then, though they said - Longer before First Relapse (Progression Free Time), even the Worst Responders had a Longer Overall Survival Rate (OS). Basically, the Clinical Trial proved everyone lived longer without an ASCT (Transplant) but this very expensive medical procedure became the marching orders to the Industry.
That said, I've talked with a few that the ASCT saved their life, often getting dual ASCT back-to-back, due to a total failure of their bone marrow, even with blood transfusions. These Do-or Die cases are far less common.
I Am Interested In Thoughts (pro And Con) About Stem Cell Transplant. It Seems Like A Very Extreme Procedure With Little Overall Benefit.
If You Were Asked To Enter A Clinical Trial Would You Do It?
What Should I Know About Stem Cell Transplant Before Hand